The main benefit of Albright’s QMS for non-medical customers is the overall Quality System emphasis on improving compliance to repeated processes. The Quality System is especially important in the integrity of the silicone material Albright uses and in the consistent, high-tech quality inspection applied to finished parts.
Silicones are playing an increasingly important role supporting improvement, innovation and progress in a wide range of industry sectors, from cars to electronics to textiles.
Read the rest here!
Last month Susan Windham-Bannister, Ph.D., President and CEO of Massachusetts Life Sciences Center, participated In the latest installment of the WBZ NewsRadio 1030 Business Breakfast series. The panelists of business leaders & experts discussed the importance of making products and profits in Massachusetts. The group also discussed how the state’s manufacturing sector is staging an epic turnaround. The event examined and discussed the stories behind manufacturing success and how the state is helping to foster this growth and the beneficial ripple effect it is creating for the Commonwealth and beyond.
Click here to watch the video of the Business Breakfast.
Click here to learn more about Massachusetts Life Sciences Center.
Two common tests are (1) to put the device or component under pressure using regulated compressed air and then submerging in water or other fluid. The leaks will show as bubbles or (2) use a colored die solution that contrasts with your part colors under pressure and the die will highlight leaks.
Ultimately whenever possible pressure testing of the final assembly under the working load or more, in as close to the final environment as possible can help identify failures caused by condition stack up.
Alternatively for many applications there may be published standard test methods that have been shown to be effective. Medical devices and aerospace both have test standards and you may find some relevant test standards under ASTM.
Click here to learn more.
Question: What shrinkage value should be used when designing a silicone mold?
Answer: Shrinkage is defined as “the amount or proportion by which something shrinks” (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/shrinkage). A material’s shrinkage must be accounted for when designing a mold to produce a silicone part that meets all required dimensions. Silicone normally can shrink from 1% to 4%. The shrinkage analysis is sometimes not provided when we buy silicone from manufacturers. Based on my personal opinion, 2% can usually be used for a standard shrinkage value when designing a silicone mold. Nevertheless, variation between material lots can significantly affect the shrinkage percentage as well as the part’s geometry. For example, a long hollow cylinder part that has a thin wall is going to shrink differently on different axes. Specifically, the long section of the part is going to shrink more than other axes. In this case, the part must be scaled differently on different axes.
The suggested shrinkage value will work most of the time. However, in a case where the material’s shrinkage doesn’t meet the standard shrinkage allowance or a part has a similar geometry to the one described above, educated estimation on shrinkage value should be made when designing a silicone mold.
Question: What is the difference in cycle time for molding medical silicone parts vs cycle time for molding medical thermal plastic parts?
Answer: The processing conditions can be optimized to match the tool design, part geometry, and material but each presents limitations. Injection process times are driven by material. Silicone parts can often be released with no draft angle or even undercuts due to the high elongation and low modulus that save time on actions but knock out pins may often damage parts. Silicone part removal is often done by automated brush, hand pull, compressed air, or another way that may take additional time compared to plastic.
Curing time can be reduced in silicone by increasing processing temperature until filling fails or surface quality diminishes. Plastic cooling rates may be more limited by internal stresses causing warping or property changes from rapid cooling. Other contributions to the cycle time include heating and cooling rates, curing or solidification time of the material, injection time, mold travel time, and other smaller contributions increase the cycle time.
Direct comparisons between cycle times of medical plastics and medical silicones are not readily available. Your molder may be able to go into detail for your application if cycle time is critical.
Question: When molding medical silicone parts in the same mold will changing the durometer change the dimensions of the molded part?
Answer: The final part dimensions will depend on inherent shrink rate and processing conditions. Different materials molded in the same mold with the same shrink rate should produce the same size parts.
Durometer changes require different materials or additives which often changes the shrink rates. Higher durometer materials often have a greater raw viscosity and may achieve greater cavity pressures that can sometimes produce slightly larger parts compared to lower durometer materials. The difference has been shown to be less than 1% for a 40 durometer change without resetting the optimal processing conditions. Generally, changing durometer in the same series for most suppliers will not significantly affect the final dimensions but a first article is recommended. If you are considering trying multiple materials then I would recommend letting your molder know as early as possible.
Answer: Part tolerances will vary from one part to the next, and is typically dependent upon the intended function of the part. While every part can be “perfect” as designed, in the real world this just isn’t the case, everything has a tolerance, it’s just a question of how tight that tolerance will be. To save molders and designers some headaches and bickering, the RMA (Rubber Manufacturers Association) was kind enough to put together a series of standardized tables of tolerances for molded rubber parts. The tables are categorized into different groups such as “Commercial”, “Precision”, and “High Precision” and are readily available for free on the internet. They’ve also created tables that reference tolerances on other aspects of the part such as miter (alignment) and flash. To learn more about RMA standard tolerances follow this link: http://www.rubberassociates.com/pdf/RMA%20tolerance%20table.pdf
Article From: Modern Machine Shop, Derek Korn, Senior Editor
Albright Technologies has become adept at micromachining molds for silicone parts such as the one to the right. This has enabled the company to become effective in quickly generating prototypes for medical device manufacturers pressured to speed new products to market. Many of the silicone components it creates are either tiny themselves or have miniscule features measuring just a few thousands of an inch. What’s interesting is that the company has found it can produce prototypes faster by taking a slower, more conservative approach to micromachining molds using end mills that measure just a few thousands of an inch in diameter.
Plus, while one might assume that very high spindle speeds are needed to effectively mill molds using such small tools, the machine that performs micromachining at Albright—a 30-taper VMC—typically spins 0.005-inch-diameter tools at just 9,000 rpm. Although that means feed rates and cycle times are relatively slow, there are a number of reasons why a company focused on quickly turning prototyping work finds this acceptable. David Comeau, Albright’s president, and Robert Waitt, vice president, explained why during a recent visit to the New England-area molder.
Click here to read the rest of the article.